PE/SoCalGas 1/10/2005 8-K

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

 

FORM 8-K

CURRENT REPORT

 

 

Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934

Date of Report

 

(Date of earliest event reported):

January 10, 2005
- -----------------------

 


Commission
File Number
- ----------------------------

Name of Registrant, State of
Incorporation, Address and
Telephone Number
- --------------------------------------

IRS Employer
Identification
Number
- ----------------------------

1-40

Pacific Enterprises
(A California Corporation)
101 Ash Street
San Diego, California 92101
(619) 696-2000

94-0743670

     

1-1402

Southern California Gas Company
(A California Corporation)
555 West Fifth Street
Los Angeles, California 90013
(213) 244-1200

95-1240705

 

 

---------------------------------------------------------------------
(Former name or former address, if changed since last report.)






FORM 8-K

ITEM 8.01 OTHER EVENTS

The following information supplements the information contained in the company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003 and its Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q for the quarters ended March 31, June 30 and September 30, 2004 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

The California energy crisis of 2000 and 200l has generated numerous lawsuits, governmental investigations and regulatory proceedings involving many energy companies. Sempra Energy and its California utility subsidiaries, Southern California Gas Company (SoCalGas) and San Diego Gas & Electric Company (SDG&E), and other Sempra Energy subsidiaries are participants in several of these actions.

As previously reported, Sempra Energy, SoCalGas and SDG&E are the remaining defendants in class-action and individual antitrust and unfair competition lawsuits alleging that they, together with El Paso Natural Gas Company and it affiliates, unlawfully sought to control natural gas and electricity markets. These cases were filed in 2000 and at various times thereafter and have been consolidated in San Diego Superior Court.

In December 2003, the Superior Court approved a settlement of claims against El Paso Natural Gas and several of its affiliates in these cases and in other California energy crisis related matters. The El Paso settlement of approximately $1.6 billion included additional claims against El Paso that are unrelated to the claims made against Sempra Energy and its California utilities. The claims against Sempra Energy, SoCalGas and SDG&E have not been settled and continue to be litigated. The class action plaintiffs have asserted that they could recover as much as $24 billion from the Sempra Energy and its California utilities if the claims are upheld at trial.

Also as previously reported, in September 2004 the San Diego Superior Court in these cases denied motions by Sempra Energy and its California utilities for summary judgments in their favor. Sempra Energy, SoCalGas and SDG&E have applied for review by the California Supreme Court of the denial of summary judgment on the claims against them following a denial of review by the California Court of Appeal. The Court of Appeal has yet to act upon Sempra Energy's separate application for review of the denial of its summary judgment motion to be dismissed from the cases. Interim review by a California appellate court prior to a Superior Court final judgment on the merits of a case is entirely within the discretion of the court. Neither the denials of summary judgment by the Superior Court nor the denial of review by the Court of Appeal constitutes a final judgment on the merits, and any Superior Court final judgment on the merits would be subject to appeal and non-discretionary review by the Court of Appeal.

These cases have been transferred to a new Superior Court trial judge to replace the previous judge, who retired at year-end. On January 10, 2005, the newly assigned judge held a status conference regarding the cases. The judge set an initial trial call date for June 3, 2005, after which he will address what issues will be decided by a jury, the scope and sequence of the several class actions and when a jury will be impaneled.






SIGNATURE

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

Pacific Enterprises



Date: January 10, 2005

By: /s/ F. H. Ault
- -----------------------------------------

 

F. H. Ault
Sr. Vice President and Controller

 

 

Southern California Gas Company

Date: January 10, 2005

By: /s/ S.D. Davis
- -----------------------------------------

 

S.D. Davis
Sr. Vice President-External Relations
and Chief Financial Officer